Claimant v London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Outcome
Individual claims
The complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the conduct amounted to harassment related to race instead.
The Tribunal upheld harassment related to race for all six allegations. Ms Pat Chen made stereotypical comments about the claimant's race, including that the Mayor would talk to her because of her heritage, and asked if she knew an Asian employee because 'you're Asian and you know all the Asians'. The conduct was found to violate the claimant's dignity and create an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment.
Facts
The claimant, an employee of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, was subjected to repeated racial stereotyping by Ms Pat Chen, the Head of HR. On three occasions, Ms Chen made comments relating to the claimant's Asian heritage, including asking if she knew other Asian employees because 'you're Asian and you know all the Asians', and stating that the Mayor would talk to her 'because of the community' and 'because of your heritage'. The grievance process was fundamentally flawed as it did not address all complaints and was not sufficiently independent, being conducted by Ms Chen's immediate manager.
Decision
The Tribunal found that the claimant had been subjected to harassment related to race on six occasions by Ms Pat Chen. The direct discrimination claims were dismissed as they were subsumed within the harassment claims. The Tribunal awarded £8,000 for injury to feelings (at the upper end of the lower Vento band) plus interest of £1,518.46, and made recommendations for future grievance handling and for a written apology to be provided to the claimant by senior management.
Practical note
Racial stereotyping, even when not intended to be offensive and followed by an apology, can constitute harassment, and grievances involving senior managers or protected characteristics require genuinely independent investigation.
Award breakdown
Vento band: upper
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3200598/2023
- Decision date
- 24 January 2025
- Hearing type
- remedy
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- local government
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No