Claimant v Piggy Leisure Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
This is a remedy hearing following a finding of unfair dismissal at a previous liability hearing. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures and the tribunal found it just and equitable to increase the compensatory award by 25%.
The respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars when the proceedings were begun. The tribunal found no exceptional circumstances and awarded four weeks' gross pay as it was just and equitable to do so.
Facts
This is a remedy hearing following a liability finding in favour of the claimant for unfair dismissal. The claimant's employment ended on 1 August 2024. The respondent failed to attend the remedy hearing. The tribunal found that the respondent had unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, and that the respondent was also in breach of its duty to provide written employment particulars.
Decision
The tribunal awarded the claimant a basic award of £4,950 and a compensatory award of £18,670.11 which included a 25% ACAS uplift. The tribunal also awarded £2,200 (four weeks' gross pay) for the respondent's failure to provide written employment particulars. The total award was £25,820.11, with recoupment provisions applying to £13,126.36 of the unfair dismissal compensation.
Practical note
Employers who fail to follow ACAS procedures and fail to provide written employment particulars face significant financial penalties, including a 25% uplift on compensatory awards and additional statutory awards of up to four weeks' pay.
Award breakdown
Adjustments
Respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6008860/2024
- Decision date
- 24 January 2025
- Hearing type
- remedy
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- hospitality
- Represented
- No
Employment details
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor