Claimant v So Eco Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The judgment was made under Rule 22, indicating this was a default judgment where the respondent did not respond to the claim.
Facts
N Goodman brought a claim against So Eco Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages. The respondent failed to respond to the claim, resulting in a default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024.
Decision
The tribunal found in favour of the claimant by default judgment. The respondent was ordered to pay £2,393.38 gross for the unauthorised deduction from wages. The scheduled hearing was cancelled as the case was determined on papers.
Practical note
Employers who fail to respond to tribunal claims face default judgments awarding the full amount claimed without a hearing.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2404755/2024
- Decision date
- 22 January 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Name
- So Eco Ltd
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No