Cases116025/2008

Claimant v Clackmannanshire District Council

22 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim. Claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons by the deadline of 9 October 2024 or to request a hearing after being given the opportunity to do so on 25 September 2024.

Facts

The claimant Ms L Blyth brought a claim against Clackmannanshire District Council in 2008. The tribunal gave the claimant notice on 25 September 2024 to provide written reasons by 9 October 2024 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given a fair opportunity to respond but failed to do so.

Practical note

A claim may be struck out for non-pursuit where the claimant fails to respond to tribunal orders or engage with the proceedings, even in a long-standing case.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
116025/2008
Decision date
22 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
public sector
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No