Cases3315346/2023

Claimant v London Borough of Haringey

22 January 2025Before Employment Judge AnstisReadingremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

The tribunal determined at a preliminary hearing that the claimant was not a disabled person by reason of her menopause or multiple sclerosis at the material time, meaning she did not meet the threshold requirement for bringing disability discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010.

Facts

The claimant, Ms O Hasan, brought disability discrimination claims against London Borough of Haringey, asserting she was disabled by reason of menopause and multiple sclerosis. The case proceeded to a preliminary hearing to determine whether the claimant met the legal definition of a disabled person under the Equality Act 2010.

Decision

Employment Judge Anstis determined at a preliminary hearing that the claimant was not a disabled person by reason of her menopause or multiple sclerosis at the material time. This finding meant the claimant did not have the protected characteristic of disability necessary to pursue her discrimination claims.

Practical note

A preliminary hearing on disability status found that menopause and multiple sclerosis did not meet the threshold for disability under the Equality Act 2010 in this particular case, emphasizing that each case turns on its specific medical evidence and impact on the individual.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

EqA 2010

Case details

Case number
3315346/2023
Decision date
22 January 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Name
London Borough of Haringey
Sector
local government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister