Claimant v WKCIC Group

The tribunal found that the respondent dismissed the claimant, which was discrimination arising from disability. The dismissal was unfavourably treatment because of something arising in consequence of the claimant's disability and was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

The tribunal found that dismissing the claimant without warning or process constituted discrimination arising from disability. This was unfavourable treatment connected to the claimant's disability and not justified.

The remaining complaints of discrimination arising from disability were not made out on the evidence. The tribunal was not satisfied that the other alleged acts constituted unfavourable treatment arising from disability or that they could not be justified.

The tribunal found that the respondent had not applied a provision, criterion or practice that put disabled persons at a particular disadvantage, or that the claimant could not establish the necessary elements of indirect discrimination.

The tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent had knowledge of the claimant's disability and failed to make reasonable adjustments, or that any specific adjustments were required that were not made.

The claimant could not establish that they had done a protected act or that any detriment was because of doing a protected act. The tribunal dismissed this claim.

The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair as the respondent failed to follow any proper process, gave no warning, and did not have a fair reason for dismissal. The dismissal was procedurally and substantively unfair.

Withdrawn by claimant