Claimant v G.R Wrights and Sons Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the dismissal was not unfair after a full merits hearing spanning five days. The claim was not well founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal found that the wrongful dismissal claim was not well founded after a full merits hearing. The claim was dismissed.
Facts
Mr Mustafa brought claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against his former employer G.R Wrights and Sons Limited. The case proceeded to a full merits hearing over five days in October 2024 and January 2025. Mr Mustafa represented himself with assistance from Mr Mustafa Senior and Miss Sanakulova, while the respondent was represented by solicitors.
Decision
The tribunal found that both the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims were not well founded and dismissed them. The full reasons for the decision were not provided in this judgment document, but would be available if requested within 14 days.
Practical note
A self-represented claimant failed to establish either unfair or wrongful dismissal after a contested five-day hearing against a legally represented employer.
Case details
- Case number
- 3201288/2023
- Decision date
- 21 January 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 5
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No