Cases4117849/2014

Claimant v Dundee City Council

17 January 2025Before Employment Judge L WisemanScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d). Claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons by deadline or request a hearing after being given opportunity by tribunal.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against Dundee City Council. On 9 December 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant until 23 December 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit. The claimant had been given a clear deadline and opportunity to explain why the claim should continue but failed to engage with the tribunal process.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal orders; failure to engage with case management directions will result in strike-out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 Schedule 1 Rule 38

Case details

Case number
4117849/2014
Decision date
17 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Dundee City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No