Claimant v AC & AA Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Under Rule 21, the tribunal determined the claim on the papers and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages totalling £87.00.
The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Under Rule 21, the tribunal determined the claim on the papers and found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement totalling £87.00.
Facts
The claimant Ms S Singh brought claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay against her employer AC & AA Ltd. The claim was issued on 29 August 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response within the required time limit.
Decision
The tribunal determined the claims under Rule 21 on the papers without a hearing. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £87.00 for unauthorised deductions from wages and £87.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement, totalling £174.00. The scheduled hearing on 7 February 2025 was cancelled.
Practical note
A Rule 21 default judgment will be entered against a respondent who fails to submit a valid response on time, with the tribunal determining the claim on the papers based on the claimant's assertion of facts.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6009971/2024
- Decision date
- 16 January 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Name
- AC & AA Ltd
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No