Cases3311008/2023

Claimant v A C Plc (in administration)

16 January 2025Before Employment Judge QuillWatfordremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£14,870

Individual claims

Failure to Inform & Consultsucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent failed in its duty to consult the claimant and his former colleagues under section 188 TULRCA 1992. The group consisted of more than 20 employees at the Head Office who were all dismissed without proper collective consultation.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 August to 18 August 2023. The sum properly payable was £2,218.18, none of which was paid by the respondent. After accounting for £1,837.14 gross received from the Secretary of State, a balance of £382.04 remained due.

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

The claimant was entitled to one month's notice but received none from the respondent. He would have earned £2,906.56 net during the notice period. After deducting £466.28 net received from the Secretary of State, the respondent was ordered to pay the balance of £2,440.28.

Breach of Contractfailed

No additional damages for breach of contract in relation to contractual entitlement to holiday were awarded. The tribunal appears to have concluded there was no additional entitlement beyond statutory rights.

Holiday Paysucceeded

Under the Working Time Regulations 1998, the claimant had accrued 3.53 weeks entitlement but had taken 3.4 weeks, leaving 0.13 weeks unused. At a weekly pay rate of £865.39, the claimant was awarded £112.50 gross for unused statutory holiday entitlement.

Facts

The claimant was one of more than 20 employees at the respondent's Head Office who were dismissed on 18 August 2023 when the company went into administration. The respondent failed to conduct collective consultation as required by law. The claimant was owed wages for 1-18 August 2023, was not given his one month's notice, and had accrued but unused statutory holiday entitlement. The Secretary of State had already made some payments to the claimant from the National Insurance Fund.

Decision

The tribunal found all claims well-founded except for contractual holiday pay. The respondent was ordered to pay a 90-day protective award, arrears of wages (less amounts already received from the Secretary of State), notice pay (less amounts received), and statutory holiday pay. The respondent's failure to appear meant the claimant's evidence was accepted.

Practical note

When a company in administration dismisses 20 or more employees without collective consultation, tribunals will award the maximum 90-day protective period, with recoupment provisions applying to offset state benefits already paid.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£2,440
Holiday pay£113
Arrears of pay£382

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

TULRCA 1992 s.188Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996TULRCA 1992 s.189Working Time Regulations 1998

Case details

Case number
3311008/2023
Decision date
16 January 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
No