Cases8000431/2024

Claimant v Kura (CS) Ltd

16 January 2025Before Employment Judge P O'DonnellScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)struck out

Claim struck out for non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the claim. Claimant failed to provide medical evidence as ordered and did not respond to the strike-out warning.

Facts

The claimant brought a disability discrimination claim against Kura (CS) Ltd. A preliminary hearing was scheduled for 13-14 August 2024 to determine disability status and time bar issues, but was postponed at the claimant's request due to health reasons. Following the postponement, the claimant failed to make substantive progress and did not comply with tribunal orders to provide medical evidence. Despite being given until 14 January 2025 to explain why the claim should not be struck out, the claimant failed to respond.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) for non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant had been given multiple opportunities to provide medical evidence and to explain why the claim should not be struck out, but failed to comply with any of these directions.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and comply with tribunal orders even when facing health difficulties, or risk strike-out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37(1)(c)Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37(1)(d)Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38

Case details

Case number
8000431/2024
Decision date
16 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No