Cases2212314/2023

Claimant v Dotcable Africa Ltd

16 January 2025Before Employment Judge M JoyceLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesnot determined

Preliminary hearing on jurisdiction and time limits. Tribunal found it had territorial jurisdiction and claims for expenses, accommodation allowance, and salary (March-June 2023) were in time. Claim for salary deduction in April 2022 was time-barred.

National Minimum Wagenot determined

Preliminary hearing on jurisdiction and time limits. Tribunal found it had territorial jurisdiction and the claim was in time as it represented an unbroken series of deductions with the last deduction on 10 July 2023, before the ET1 was filed.

Facts

The claimant, a consultant and 40% shareholder/director of the respondent, was contracted in the UK on 1 May 2019 but posted to Senegal in June 2019 for an overseas assignment initially until April 2021. He was paid salary, expenses, and accommodation allowance into a UK bank account with UK tax deductions. From March 2022, the respondent ceased paying expenses and accommodation allowance, and from March 2023 ceased paying salary. The claimant filed an ET1 in July 2023 claiming unlawful deductions and national minimum wage breaches. The respondent challenged territorial jurisdiction, arguing the claimant was a true expatriate working in Senegal.

Decision

The tribunal found it had territorial jurisdiction because the claimant was a representative of a British business abroad, paid into a UK bank account with UK tax deductions, and the respondent was registered at the claimant's UK home address. The tribunal also found the claims for expenses, accommodation allowance, and salary (March-June 2023) were in time as they formed a series of deductions. The claim for April 2022 salary deduction was time-barred. The tribunal determined that expenses and accommodation allowance fell within the definition of wages under the ERA.

Practical note

An employee posted abroad may still have sufficient connection with Great Britain for UK employment law to apply, particularly where they represent a British business, are paid into a UK account with UK tax deductions, and were intended to return to the UK.

Legal authorities cited

Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton [2015] ICR 221British Council v Jeffrey [2019] ICR 929Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children Schools and Families (No 2) [2011] ICR 1312Ravisy v Simmons and Simmons LLP [2018] UKEAT/0085/18/OOLawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3Southwark London Borough Council v O'Brien 1996 IRLR 420Qantas Cabin Crew (UK) Ltd v Lopez [2013] IRLR 4Carver v Saudi Arabian Airlines (1999) ICR 991Todd v British Midland Airways Ltd [1978] ICR 959

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.27ERA 1996 s.23ERA 1996 s.13

Case details

Case number
2212314/2023
Decision date
16 January 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
energy
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Consultant
Salary band
£15,000–£20,000

Claimant representation

Represented
No