Cases114582/2009

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

15 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal's order of 5 September 2024 by the deadline of 19 September 2024 to provide reasons or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Mrs E Jack brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP in 2009. On 5 September 2024, the tribunal ordered the claimant to provide written reasons by 19 September 2024 or request a hearing to show why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give acceptable reasons or request a hearing as directed.

Practical note

Failure to comply with tribunal orders and actively pursue a claim will result in strike-out, even in long-standing cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
114582/2009
Decision date
15 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No