Cases1405011/2023

Claimant v Bradford Bradshaw Luxury Appliances Limited

15 January 2025Before Employment Judge N ClarksonBristolremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£18,431

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded. The respondent did not attend the hearing to defend the claim. The claimant was dismissed unfairly before the company went into administration on 8 March 2023.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with written statement of employment particulars when proceedings began. The tribunal found no exceptional circumstances to prevent an award under section 38 Employment Act 2002.

Facts

Ms Woodroffe was dismissed by Bradford Bradshaw Luxury Appliances Limited. The respondent company subsequently went into administration on 8 March 2023. The respondent failed to provide written statement of employment particulars and did not attend the tribunal hearing to defend the unfair dismissal claim brought by the claimant.

Decision

The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim succeeded as the respondent did not attend to defend it. However, the tribunal applied a Polkey reduction, finding that employment would have ended anyway when the company went into administration one month later, limiting compensation to that period. An additional award was made for failure to provide written employment particulars.

Practical note

Even where unfair dismissal succeeds by default, tribunals will apply Polkey principles to limit compensation where the employment would have ended anyway due to subsequent insolvency or administration.

Award breakdown

Basic award£13,300
Compensatory award£3,511

Adjustments

Polkey reduction100%

Employment would have ended in any event when the respondent company went into administration on 8 March 2023, when claimant would have been made redundant. Compensatory award limited to one month's loss of earnings before administration.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Act 2002 s.38

Case details

Case number
1405011/2023
Decision date
15 January 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
No

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
No