Cases4118577/2014

Claimant v Midlothian Council

14 January 2025Before Employment Judge L WisemanScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant was given until 31 December 2024 to provide written reasons or request a hearing but failed to give an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Facts

Mr Wilson brought a claim against Midlothian Council in 2014. The claim was not actively pursued. On 17 December 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 31 December 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reason.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out but failed to give an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal directions; failure to do so will result in strike-out under rule 38(1)(d).

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 Schedule 1 rule 38Employment Tribunals Rules rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4118577/2014
Decision date
14 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Midlothian Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No