Cases121141/2008

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

13 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. Claimant failed to provide written reasons by 26 September 2024 or request a hearing after being given opportunity by the Tribunal on 12 September 2024.

Facts

Mrs J Campbell brought a claim against Glasgow City Council (case number 121141/2008). On 12 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 26 September 2024 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reason.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given a clear opportunity to respond but failed to engage with the process.

Practical note

A claimant must actively pursue their claim and respond to tribunal directions, or risk having the claim struck out for non-pursuit even after being given a final opportunity to show cause.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, rule 37Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
121141/2008
Decision date
13 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No