Claimant v Purple Panda Services Ltd

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have two years continuous service, which is a statutory requirement for unfair dismissal claims, and the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's strike out warning dated 4 November 2024.

The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 following the claimant's failure to attend the hearing on 10 January 2025. The tribunal was satisfied the claimant was aware of the hearing date through notices sent on 31 July 2024 and joining instructions sent the day before, but the claimant did not attend and did not answer telephone enquiries about their non-attendance.

The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 following the claimant's failure to attend the hearing on 10 January 2025. The tribunal was satisfied the claimant was aware of the hearing date through notices sent on 31 July 2024 and joining instructions sent the day before, but the claimant did not attend and did not answer telephone enquiries about their non-attendance.