Cases8001681/2024

Claimant v Craigs of Cumbernauld Ltd

10 January 2025Before Employment Judge R McPhersonScotlandremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£1,099

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 by omitting to pay the claimant his full annual leave entitlement under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant accrued annual leave pay to which he was entitled under the Working Time Regulations 1998, constituting a breach of his statutory entitlement.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of contract by not paying the claimant wages due to him and for accrued annual leave pay, awarding damages for the breach.

Facts

Mr Molloy brought claims against his former employer Craigs of Cumbernauld Ltd for unpaid wages and holiday pay. The respondent had failed to pay the claimant his full annual leave entitlement and wages due to him upon termination of employment. The matter proceeded to a final hearing conducted remotely via CVP.

Decision

The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on all claims, ruling that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay holiday entitlement, and had breached the claimant's contract. The tribunal awarded £1,099.20 gross to be paid net after deduction of tax and national insurance.

Practical note

Employers must ensure full payment of accrued holiday pay and wages on termination to avoid liability for unauthorised deductions and breach of contract claims.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£1,099

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13Working Time Regulations 1998 reg.14

Case details

Case number
8001681/2024
Decision date
10 January 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
No