Cases2600198/2024

Claimant v Staffordshire County Council

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the dismissal was fair and within the range of reasonable responses available to the employer. Oral reasons were given at the hearing but the claimants did not succeed on this claim.

Breach of Contractfailed

The tribunal determined there was no breach of contract by the respondent. The claim was not well-founded and was dismissed.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found there had been no unauthorised deductions from wages. The claim was not well-founded and was dismissed.

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the dismissal was fair and within the range of reasonable responses available to the employer. Oral reasons were given at the hearing but the claimants did not succeed on this claim.

Breach of Contractfailed

The tribunal determined there was no breach of contract by the respondent. The claim was not well-founded and was dismissed.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found there had been no unauthorised deductions from wages. The claim was not well-founded and was dismissed.

Facts

Two claimants, Ms L Baxter and Ms M Boston, brought claims against Staffordshire County Council alleging unfair dismissal, breach of contract and unauthorised deductions from wages. The case was heard over three days with both parties represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all claims finding them not well-founded. The tribunal found the dismissals were fair, there was no breach of contract, and there were no unauthorised deductions from wages. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.

Practical note

The tribunal found the employer acted reasonably in dismissing both claimants and there were no contractual breaches or unauthorised wage deductions.

Case details

Case number
2600198/2024
Decision date
10 January 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Name
Staffordshire County Council
Sector
local government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister