Claimant v Auto Restore
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out for non-pursuit. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal letter dated 16 September 2024 giving opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
Claim struck out for non-pursuit. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal letter dated 16 September 2024 giving opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
Facts
N Summers brought a claim against Auto Restore in 2022. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 16 September 2024 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond or make any sufficient representations.
Decision
Regional Employment Judge Foxwell struck out the claim on papers for failure to actively pursue it. The claimant had been given a clear opportunity to respond to the unless order but failed to do so.
Practical note
Claimants must respond to tribunal correspondence and actively pursue their claims, or face strike-out for non-pursuit even without a hearing.
Case details
- Case number
- 3309086/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- Auto Restore
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No