Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal dismissed the claim of indirect age discrimination, finding it not well-founded. The judgment was delivered orally at the hearing with written reasons available on request.
The tribunal dismissed the victimisation claim under the Equality Act 2010, finding it not well-founded. The judgment was delivered orally at the hearing with written reasons available on request.
The tribunal dismissed the claim of detriment for making a protected disclosure under s48 ERA 1996, finding it not well-founded. The judgment was delivered orally at the hearing with written reasons available on request.
Facts
Mr Marshall brought claims against Royal Mail Group Limited alleging indirect age discrimination, victimisation under the Equality Act 2010, and detriment for making protected disclosures under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The case was heard over four days via video hearing at Watford Employment Tribunal before a full panel.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all three claims, finding them not well-founded. The tribunal delivered its judgment orally at the hearing with written reasons available upon request within 14 days.
Practical note
All three claims brought by the claimant against Royal Mail Group Limited failed on their merits after a four-day full hearing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3312327/2023
- Decision date
- 9 January 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister