Cases6001503/2023

Claimant v Secretary of State for Defence

9 January 2025Before Employment Judge Roperon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out for non-pursuit after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing following the tribunal's letter of 26 November 2024 giving the claimant an opportunity to show cause why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against the Ministry of Defence in 2023. On 26 November 2024, the tribunal wrote to the claimant giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond or make any sufficient representations.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given notice and an opportunity to respond but failed to do so, leading to the strike-out on the papers without a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal directions, or face strike-out for non-pursuit even without a hearing.

Case details

Case number
6001503/2023
Decision date
9 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
military
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No