Cases121375/2008

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

9 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal's order dated 13 August 2024 by the deadline of 27 August 2024, providing no acceptable reason or requesting a hearing.

Facts

Miss M Wilson brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. The tribunal issued an order on 13 August 2024 requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 27 August 2024 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or comply with this order.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue it. The claimant provided no acceptable reason for non-compliance with the tribunal's order and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore dismissed.

Practical note

Claimants must respond to tribunal orders and actively pursue their claims, or risk strike-out for non-pursuit under rule 37(1)(d).

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 Rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
121375/2008
Decision date
9 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No