Claimant v Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the Secretary of State had incorrectly calculated notice pay for the claimants in three respects: incorrect calculation of earnings from new employment, improper deductions for notional benefits they could have claimed, and incorrect national insurance deductions. The Secretary of State applied a blanket policy without proper consideration of individual circumstances and failed to prove that the claimants unreasonably failed to mitigate their losses by not claiming unemployment benefits.
Facts
Twelve claimants worked at Elliott House Limited, a care home that closed on 19 November 2021. Most were dismissed on 26 November 2021 after a period of uncertainty. The employer became insolvent, with a winding-up order made on 15 March 2023. The claimants applied to the Redundancy Payments Service for notice pay. They disputed the amounts paid, arguing the Secretary of State incorrectly calculated earnings from new employment, improperly deducted for benefits they could have claimed but did not, and wrongly deducted national insurance in some cases.
Decision
The tribunal found in favour of ten claimants (one claim dismissed for Humphreys). The Secretary of State had applied a blanket policy of deducting notional benefits without proper consideration of individual circumstances and had not proved that the claimants unreasonably failed to mitigate their losses by not claiming unemployment benefits. The tribunal also found errors in calculating earnings from new employment for three claimants and incorrect national insurance deductions for two claimants. Total additional payments awarded amounted to £1,660.03.
Practical note
The Secretary of State cannot apply a blanket policy of deducting notional benefits in insolvency claims without proving that each individual claimant unreasonably failed to mitigate their losses; the burden is on the Secretary of State to establish unreasonable failure to claim benefits.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2306307/2023
- Decision date
- 9 January 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Secretary of State for Business and Trade
- Sector
- central government
- Represented
- No
Employment details
- Role
- care home workers
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor