Cases2306307/2023

Claimant v Secretary of State for Business and Trade

9 January 2025Before Employment Judge CurtisLondon South

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£1,660

Individual claims

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The tribunal found that the Secretary of State had incorrectly calculated notice pay for the claimants in three respects: incorrect calculation of earnings from new employment, improper deductions for notional benefits they could have claimed, and incorrect national insurance deductions. The Secretary of State applied a blanket policy without proper consideration of individual circumstances and failed to prove that the claimants unreasonably failed to mitigate their losses by not claiming unemployment benefits.

Facts

Twelve claimants worked at Elliott House Limited, a care home that closed on 19 November 2021. Most were dismissed on 26 November 2021 after a period of uncertainty. The employer became insolvent, with a winding-up order made on 15 March 2023. The claimants applied to the Redundancy Payments Service for notice pay. They disputed the amounts paid, arguing the Secretary of State incorrectly calculated earnings from new employment, improperly deducted for benefits they could have claimed but did not, and wrongly deducted national insurance in some cases.

Decision

The tribunal found in favour of ten claimants (one claim dismissed for Humphreys). The Secretary of State had applied a blanket policy of deducting notional benefits without proper consideration of individual circumstances and had not proved that the claimants unreasonably failed to mitigate their losses by not claiming unemployment benefits. The tribunal also found errors in calculating earnings from new employment for three claimants and incorrect national insurance deductions for two claimants. Total additional payments awarded amounted to £1,660.03.

Practical note

The Secretary of State cannot apply a blanket policy of deducting notional benefits in insolvency claims without proving that each individual claimant unreasonably failed to mitigate their losses; the burden is on the Secretary of State to establish unreasonable failure to claim benefits.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£1,660

Legal authorities cited

Westwood v Secretary of State for Employment [1985] AC 20Secretary of State for Employment v Stewart [1996] IRLR 334

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.182Insolvency Act 1986 s.130(2)Employment Rights Act 1996 s.188Employment Rights Act 1996 s.183Employment Rights Act 1996 s.184Employment Rights Act 1996 s.185

Case details

Case number
2306307/2023
Decision date
9 January 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Name
Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Sector
central government
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
care home workers

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor