Cases121180/2008

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

8 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-pursuit under rule 37(1)(d). Claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's order dated 5 September 2024 requiring written reasons by 19 September 2024 or a request for a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Mrs M Kennedy brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. The case number suggests the claim was filed in 2008. On 5 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant until 19 September 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant had been given an opportunity to show cause but failed to give an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must respond to tribunal orders and actively pursue their claims, or risk strike-out for non-pursuit even in long-running cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
121180/2008
Decision date
8 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No