Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out for non-pursuit. The tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations on 20 December 2024, but the claimant failed to respond or request a hearing.
Facts
Mr M Ikram brought an employment claim against Speedibake in 2024. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 20 December 2024 giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond or make sufficient representations.
Decision
Employment Judge Miller struck out the claim on 8 January 2025 because the claimant had not actively pursued it. The claimant had been given notice and an opportunity to respond but failed to do so.
Practical note
Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal correspondence or risk having their claim struck out under rule 37.
Case details
- Case number
- 6002102/2024
- Decision date
- 8 January 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- Speedibake
- Sector
- manufacturing
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No