Cases106337/2005

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

8 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's order dated 5 September 2024 requesting written reasons or a hearing request by 19 September 2024.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against Glasgow City Council with a case number from 2005. On 5 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant until 19 September 2024 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or request a hearing.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant's failure to respond to the tribunal's order or provide acceptable reasons meant the claim could not proceed.

Practical note

Claimants must actively respond to tribunal orders and pursue their claims or risk strike-out for non-pursuit under rule 37(1)(d).

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
106337/2005
Decision date
8 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No