Cases121199/2008

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

8 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit. Claimant failed to provide reasons or request a hearing after being given opportunity by the Tribunal on 5 September 2024 with deadline of 19 September 2024.

Facts

Mrs MacPherson brought a claim against Glasgow City Council with case number 121199/2008. On 5 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 19 September 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reason.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to engage with the Tribunal's unless order and provided no explanation or request for a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively engage with tribunal procedures and respond to unless orders, or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit regardless of the merits.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
121199/2008
Decision date
8 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No