Cases115477/2009

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

6 January 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim. Claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing after being given opportunity to do so by 19 September 2024.

Facts

Claimant Mrs A M Tomlinson brought claims against Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP. On 5 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 19 September 2024 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given a fair opportunity to respond but failed to do so, providing no acceptable reason why the strike-out should not proceed.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal orders, or face strike-out under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 Rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
115477/2009
Decision date
6 January 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No