Claimant v Arriva London
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay contrary to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded. The claim was dismissed, indicating the tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages.
Facts
Mrs Liane Osman brought a claim against her employer Arriva London alleging unauthorised deductions from her wages. The hearing took place remotely by CVP at London South tribunal. She was represented by her husband, while the respondent was represented by a solicitor, Mrs Royle.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the claim, finding that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded. No compensation was awarded to the claimant.
Practical note
An unlawful deduction from wages claim requires the claimant to establish that deductions were made without proper authorization under the contract or statute.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2303326/2024
- Decision date
- 6 January 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Arriva London
- Sector
- transport
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep