Claimant v Y

Claim struck out for non-compliance with tribunal orders. Claimant failed to exchange witness statements by the ordered date despite multiple extensions. Tribunal found that while the failure was due to the claimant's mental health issues and not deliberate, a fair hearing was no longer possible given the significant delay, the passage of time since the alleged incidents (4-5 years), and the significant risk of further postponements.

Claim struck out for non-compliance with tribunal orders. Tribunal found that even with reasonable adjustments for the claimant's mental health disabilities, there was a significant risk that a fair hearing could not take place within a reasonable time, and that witnesses' memories would have faded given the passage of time since incidents dating back to October 2019.

One allegation concerned sexual harassment (conduct of a sexual nature). Claim struck out on the same basis as other claims: non-compliance with orders and impossibility of a fair hearing due to the claimant's ongoing mental health issues preventing her from completing witness statements or participating in hearings.

Three incidents alleged to be victimisation following protected acts (grievance raised 15 October 2020 and cease and desist notice 9 November 2020). Struck out on same basis as other claims for non-compliance and impossibility of fair hearing.