Cases6007111/2024

Claimant v Mr David Fung Lee

3 January 2025Before Employment Judge B ElgotLondon Eastremote video

Outcome

Default judgment£653

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

Default judgment entered under Rule 21 as the respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and was satisfied the claim for unpaid wages could be properly determined on the available material. The tribunal awarded the full amount claimed.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim for unpaid wages against Mr David Fung Lee. The respondent did not enter a response to the claim. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant at a remote video hearing. The claimant sought payment of £653.33 or the US dollar equivalent of $810 for unpaid wages.

Decision

The tribunal entered default judgment under Rule 21 in favor of the claimant. Having heard the claimant's evidence and being satisfied the claim could be properly determined on available material, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £653.33 or the US dollar equivalent. Payment was to be made by international bank transfer to the claimant's US account within 21 days.

Practical note

Where a respondent fails to enter a response, tribunals can enter default judgment under Rule 21 after hearing evidence from the claimant to satisfy themselves that the claim can be properly determined.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£653

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Rule 21

Case details

Case number
6007111/2024
Decision date
3 January 2025
Hearing type
default judgment
Hearing days
1
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No