Cases6028183/2025

Claimant v Secretary of State for Business and Trade

18 December 2025Before Employment Judge R HavardWalesremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Othernot determined

This was a preliminary hearing to determine employment status. The tribunal found the claimant was an employee under section 230(1) ERA 1996, resolving a jurisdictional issue before the substantive claims against the insolvent employer could proceed to a remedy hearing.

Facts

The claimant brought claims against an insolvent company (Coedlas Developments Limited, in creditors voluntary liquidation) and the Secretary of State for Business and Trade. The first respondent disputed whether the claimant was an employee. The second respondent did not appear at the preliminary hearing.

Decision

The tribunal determined as a preliminary issue that the claimant was an employee of the second respondent under section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The case was then listed for a half-day remedy hearing to determine the substantive claims.

Practical note

In insolvency cases, the Secretary of State may dispute employment status to limit liability under the redundancy payments scheme, requiring a preliminary hearing to establish the employment relationship before substantive claims can proceed.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.230(1)

Case details

Case number
6028183/2025
Decision date
18 December 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Name
Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Sector
central government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
No