Cases121365/2008

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

17 December 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant was given an opportunity on 13 August 2024 to provide written reasons by 27 August 2024 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out, but failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Facts

This was a long-standing claim originally filed in 2008 against Glasgow City Council. By August 2024, the tribunal had concerns that the claim was not being actively pursued. On 13 August 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant until 27 August 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given a clear opportunity to show cause but failed to engage with the tribunal's warning.

Practical note

A claim that has been dormant for many years will be struck out if the claimant fails to respond to the tribunal's warning and opportunity to show cause why it should continue.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals Rules rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
121365/2008
Decision date
17 December 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No