Claimant v Surgo Construction Limited (in Administration)
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent entered administration on 14 March 2024 and proposed to dismiss 46 employees as redundant, with first dismissals on 13 March 2024. There was no proper warning or consultation undertaken with the recognised trade union UNITE before 13 March 2024, and no employee representatives had been elected or appointed. The respondent failed to file a response and the administrator consented to the claim proceeding. The tribunal found the respondent in breach of section 188 TULRCA 1992 and awarded the maximum 90-day protective award.
Facts
Surgo Construction Limited entered administration on 14 March 2024 and dismissed approximately 46 employees as redundant from its Newcastle site, with first dismissals on 13 March 2024. UNITE the Union had a recognition agreement covering unskilled, skilled and craft employees. The respondent failed to undertake any proper warning or consultation with UNITE before the dismissals, and no employee representatives were elected. The administrator did not defend the claim and consented to it proceeding.
Decision
The tribunal found the respondent in breach of section 188 TULRCA 1992 for failure to consult. Judgment was entered under Rule 21 without a hearing as the respondent failed to file a response. The tribunal awarded the maximum 90-day protective award under section 189 to all affected employees covered by the UNITE recognition agreement who were dismissed as redundant on or after 13 March 2024.
Practical note
Even in administration, employers must comply with collective redundancy consultation obligations with recognised trade unions, and failure to do so will result in the maximum 90-day protective award.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2501671/2024
- Decision date
- 25 November 2024
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- construction
- Represented
- No
Employment details
- Role
- unskilled, skilled and craft employees
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No
- Rep type
- union