Cases4118449/2014

Claimant v Midlothian Council

21 November 2024Before Employment Judge L WisemanScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit after the claimant failed to provide written reasons by the deadline of 3 October 2024 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out, following the tribunal's opportunity to do so given on 19 September 2024.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against Midlothian Council in 2014. On 19 September 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 3 October 2024 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reason.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given a clear opportunity and deadline to respond but failed to do so.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal orders; failure to engage with the process will result in strike-out for non-pursuit even in long-standing cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals Rules rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4118449/2014
Decision date
21 November 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Midlothian Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No