Claimant v Dhaliwal Restaurants Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant for 4.5 days of annual leave accrued but not taken on termination. The respondent admitted this failure. The claimant was entitled to 5.6 weeks annual leave per year under the Working Time Regulations 1998, and the failure to pay constituted an unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide written itemised pay statements during employment as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent made unnotified deductions totalling £125.18 for tax and national insurance in April and May 2024. Under section 12(4), the tribunal ordered payment of the aggregate unnotified deductions.
The tribunal found the respondent breached its duty under section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide written statement of employment particulars when the claimant began employment on 28 March 2024. This was not rectified by the time proceedings began. Under section 38 Employment Act 2002, the tribunal awarded the minimum amount of two weeks' pay, finding no exceptional circumstances to make such an award unjust or inequitable.
Facts
The claimant worked as a shop assistant for the respondent from 28 March to 3 June 2024, working 40 hours per week at £11.44 per hour. She never received written employment particulars or payslips during her employment. On leaving, she was not paid for 4.5 days of accrued but untaken annual leave. The respondent, a restaurant company, admitted these failures and blamed difficulties with its former accountant. The claimant raised a grievance on 3 June 2024 which was not formally responded to, though the respondent attempted informal resolution via WhatsApp.
Decision
The tribunal upheld all three claims. The respondent was ordered to pay £411.84 for unpaid holiday pay, £915.20 (two weeks' pay) for failure to provide written employment particulars, and £125.18 for unnotified deductions from pay relating to tax and national insurance. The tribunal declined to apply an ACAS Code uplift, finding the respondent had made genuine efforts at informal resolution despite not formally responding to the grievance.
Practical note
Employers must provide written employment particulars from day one and itemised payslips at or before each payment, with significant penalties for non-compliance even in short employments and regardless of accounting difficulties.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1602464/2024
- Decision date
- 7 November 2024
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- hospitality
- Represented
- No
Employment details
- Role
- shop assistant
- Service
- 2 months
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No