Claimant v Booker Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the dismissal unfair despite the admitted misconduct. The respondent failed to carry out a reasonable investigation, failed to weigh up significant mitigating factors including the claimant's seven-year exemplary record, and failed to consider the toxic workplace culture where managers were complicit in inappropriate banter and standards were not enforced. The investigation had material flaws including failure to resolve factual disputes about when the claimant could have apologised and what was said in an informal meeting with a manager. The tribunal concluded no reasonable employer would have dismissed in these circumstances, and a written warning would have been within the band of reasonable responses for at least some employers.
Facts
The claimant, a driver/trainer with seven years' exemplary service, was dismissed for gross misconduct after using offensive language ('fucking mong') directed at a female colleague during an office discussion about weight loss on 26 July 2023. The incident occurred in a dysfunctional office environment characterised by widespread inappropriate banter, pranks, and poor enforcement of workplace standards by managers who were themselves complicit in the unprofessional culture. The claimant apologised when he first saw the colleague after her two-week absence, but the respondent viewed this as too late. The tribunal heard extensive evidence of a toxic workplace culture where dignity at work policies were not enforced, managers participated in inappropriate behaviour including name-calling, and training was ineffective.
Decision
The tribunal found the dismissal procedurally and substantively unfair. While the respondent had a potentially fair reason (the offensive language constituted misconduct), the investigation was inadequate with multiple material failings: failure to resolve factual disputes about the apology timeline, failure to re-interview key witnesses, inadequate consideration of the toxic workplace culture and lack of prior enforcement, insufficient weight given to seven years' exemplary service, and treating admitted procedural failings as external to the process. The tribunal concluded no reasonable employer would have dismissed in these circumstances given the context, and a written warning would have been within the band of reasonable responses.
Practical note
Employers with dysfunctional workplace cultures where standards are not consistently enforced create a 'false sense of security' and risk unfair dismissal findings if they suddenly dismiss an employee with an exemplary record for isolated misconduct without fully investigating the cultural context and properly weighing mitigation.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2400482/2024
- Decision date
- 14 October 2024
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Booker Limited
- Sector
- retail
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Employment details
- Role
- driver/trainer
- Service
- 8 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No