Cases3200779/2024

Claimant v Queen Mary University London

26 September 2024Before Employment Judge L Howden-EvansEast Londonremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Detrimentnot determined

The tribunal determined only that the complaints under s146 and s169 TULRCA were presented in time and will proceed. The substantive merits of the trade union detriment claims have not yet been determined.

Othernot determined

The tribunal determined only that the complaint under Regulation 9 Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010 was presented in time and will proceed. This blacklisting claim has not yet been determined on its merits.

Facts

Dr Z Dinnen brought complaints against Queen Mary University London under sections 146 and 169 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and Regulation 9 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010. The respondent challenged whether the claims were presented in time.

Decision

The tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine time limit issues. Employment Judge Howden-Evans ruled that all complaints were presented within the applicable time limits and will therefore proceed to a full merits hearing.

Practical note

This preliminary hearing resolved only jurisdictional time limit issues for trade union detriment and blacklisting claims, allowing the substantive claims to proceed.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010 Reg 9TULRCA s.146TULRCA s.169

Case details

Case number
3200779/2024
Decision date
26 September 2024
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister