Cases1406385/2023

Claimant v University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust

11 September 2024Before Employment Judge SmailSouth West Regionremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found the claimants' claims to holiday pay in respect of their zero-hours Bank contracts under regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 were well-founded. The respondent had failed to properly calculate and pay holiday entitlement for workers on zero-hours contracts.

Facts

Multiple claimants working for University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust on zero-hours Bank contracts brought claims for unpaid holiday pay. The respondent challenged whether claims were brought in time and disputed the amounts due, producing a Counter-Schedule calculating what it considered to be owed.

Decision

The tribunal found the claims were brought in time and were well-founded under regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The respondent was ordered to pay the sums it had calculated in its Counter-Schedule within 28 days, with two claimants given liberty to challenge those calculations if advised.

Practical note

NHS employers using zero-hours Bank contracts must properly calculate and pay holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998, and failure to do so will result in liability for unpaid holiday pay.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Working Time Regulations 1998 regulation 16(1)Working Time Regulations 1998 regulation 30(5)

Case details

Case number
1406385/2023
Decision date
11 September 2024
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep