Cases4102040/2015

Claimant v Angus Council

6 September 2024Before Employment Judge L WisemanScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit. The claimant's correspondence was returned marked 'gone away', no new address was provided, and the claimant's previous agents withdrew from acting and held no alternative address.

Facts

The claimant Ms G Russell brought a claim against Angus Council in 2015. By September 2024, correspondence to the claimant at her provided address was returned marked 'gone away'. The claimant's previous legal representatives had withdrawn from acting and held no alternative address for her. The claimant failed to update her contact details with the tribunal.

Decision

Employment Judge Wiseman struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal found that the claimant's failure to maintain contact and provide a current address demonstrated that the claim was not being actively pursued.

Practical note

Claimants must maintain current contact details with the tribunal and actively pursue their claims, or risk having them struck out for non-pursuit even after years of proceedings.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals Rules rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4102040/2015
Decision date
6 September 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Angus Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No