Cases2305935/2023

Claimant v Costain Group Plc

19 July 2024Before Employment Judge R EvansLondon Centralon papers

Outcome

Other

Facts

The claimant filed a claim on 25 October 2023. The respondent did not file a response, and a Rule 21 default judgment was issued on 18 March 2024. The respondent's solicitors applied for reconsideration on 8 April 2024, stating they had not received the claim form or notice and only became aware of the claim upon receiving the judgment. The claimant opposed the application, arguing the respondent's delay was intentional and their statements misleading.

Decision

Employment Judge Evans revoked the Rule 21 judgment and accepted the respondent's late response. The judge concluded that the respondent likely either did not receive the claim form or made an administrative error, noting it was highly unlikely the respondent would have ignored the claim deliberately. The prejudice to the respondent in being unable to defend the claim outweighed the prejudice to the claimant of delay and loss of the default judgment.

Practical note

A Rule 21 default judgment will generally be set aside on reconsideration where a respondent can show it did not receive the claim form or made an administrative error, as the prejudice of being unable to defend on the merits outweighs delay to the claimant.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 71Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 20Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 72Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 70

Case details

Case number
2305935/2023
Decision date
19 July 2024
Hearing type
reconsideration
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
construction
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No