Cases3305889/2023

Claimant v Cosmur Construction London Limited

17 July 2024Before Employment Judge CaidenWatfordremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Failure to Inform & Consultsucceeded

The respondent failed to comply with section 188 TULCRA requirements for collective redundancy consultation. Despite proposing to dismiss 33 employees, the respondent provided virtually no meaningful consultation: elected representatives were chosen on 29 March 2023 but received no information before dismissals on 31 March 2023, just two days later. This was tantamount to complete failure to comply with the statutory 30-day minimum consultation period.

Facts

The claimant was an Estimator employed by a construction company from October 2018 until dismissed for redundancy on 31 March 2023. The respondent, facing financial difficulties, proposed dismissing 33 employees. On 20 March 2023 employees were informally told of potential redundancies. A letter on 27 March 2023 promised consultation and stated representatives would be elected. Representatives including the claimant were elected on 29 March 2023, but no consultation occurred. All 33 employees were dismissed on 31 March 2023 with no meaningful consultation having taken place. The claimant obtained new employment on 9 May 2023.

Decision

The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with section 188 TULCRA collective redundancy consultation requirements. Despite the statutory minimum 30-day consultation period, the respondent provided virtually no consultation: representatives were elected just two days before dismissals and received no information. The tribunal awarded the maximum 90-day protective award as there were no mitigating circumstances and the breach was tantamount to complete failure to comply with consultation requirements.

Practical note

Employers proposing 20+ redundancies must provide meaningful collective consultation for at least 30 days; financial difficulties do not excuse failure to consult, and tribunals will award maximum 90-day protective awards where there is virtually no compliance with consultation obligations.

Legal authorities cited

Newage Transmission Ltd v Transport and General Workers Union UKEAT/0131/05Smith and Moore v Cherry Lewis Ltd (in receivership) [2005] IRLR 86Susie Radin Ltd v GMB [2004] IRLR 400Cranswick Country Food plc v GMB UKEAT/0225/05/ZTLondon Borough of Barnet v Unison UKEAT/0191/13

Statutes

TULCRA 1992 s.189TULCRA 1992 s.188

Case details

Case number
3305889/2023
Decision date
17 July 2024
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
construction
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
Estimator
Service
4 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No