Claimant v Rainsford Contracts Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found no evidence that the decision to dismiss the claimant was in any part due to his race. Mr Dennis had hired the claimant knowing his racial origin (Arab/Lebanese) and chose him over an English applicant. The dismissal was based on the claimant's conduct: sending unprofessional and rude emails to colleagues and the client, issuing ultimatums, micromanaging colleagues, and flagrantly disregarding explicit management instructions not to email the client. The tribunal concluded that Mr Dennis would have treated any employee, irrespective of race, in the same way for such conduct.
Facts
The claimant, a Lebanese project manager, was employed for just 18 days (23 January to 10 February 2023) before being dismissed during his probationary period. He was hired to manage a conversion project and develop relations with the main contractor CIRC to secure future work. Within days of starting, the claimant engaged in unprofessional conduct: sending rude emails to colleagues and the client (including late at night), issuing ultimatums to management, micromanaging a quantity surveyor, and flagrantly disregarding explicit management instructions not to email the client. After repeated warnings and attempts to resolve matters, the managing director dismissed him, concerned the claimant jeopardised the relationship with CIRC.
Decision
The tribunal unanimously dismissed the race discrimination claim. The tribunal found the claimant's dismissal was entirely due to his unprofessional conduct and not his Arab/Lebanese origin. The managing director had knowingly hired the claimant over an English applicant, demonstrating no racial animus. The tribunal concluded that any employee, regardless of race, would have been treated the same way for such conduct. The burden of proof did not shift to the respondent, but even if it had, the respondent satisfied the tribunal that race played no part in the decision.
Practical note
A short service dismissal during probation for documented unprofessional conduct (inappropriate emails, insubordination, damaging client relations) will defeat a race discrimination claim where the employer hired the claimant knowing their racial origin and there is no evidence race influenced the dismissal decision.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2301854/2023
- Decision date
- 16 July 2024
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- construction
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Employment details
- Role
- Project Manager
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No