Cases2200794/2024

Claimant v Fresh & Wild Limited

4 July 2024Before Employment Judge GoodmanLondon Central

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(race)struck out

The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £25 following a preliminary hearing on 7 May 2024. The claimant failed to pay the deposit by the required date. The claim was therefore struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 for non-payment of the deposit.

Harassment(race)struck out

The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £25 following a preliminary hearing on 7 May 2024. The claimant failed to pay the deposit by the required date. The claim was therefore struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 for non-payment of the deposit.

Facts

The claimant brought claims of race discrimination and race harassment against Fresh and Wild Ltd. Following a preliminary hearing on 7 May 2024, the claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £25. The order was sent to the claimant on 14 May 2024. The claimant failed to pay the deposit as required.

Decision

The tribunal struck out both the race discrimination and race harassment claims under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 due to the claimant's failure to pay the ordered deposit of £25. The full merits hearing scheduled for 17-19 September 2024 was cancelled.

Practical note

A claimant's failure to pay a deposit ordered following a preliminary hearing will result in automatic strike out of the claims under rule 39(4), even where the deposit amount is modest.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 39(4)

Case details

Case number
2200794/2024
Decision date
4 July 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No