Claimant v Searce UK Limited

Claimant accepted he lacked qualifying service (less than 2 years) for unfair dismissal and withdrew this claim.

Claimant accepted he lacked qualifying service (less than 2 years) for redundancy payment and withdrew this claim.

Struck out under rule 37 as having no reasonable prospect of success. Claimant asserted no facts from which tribunal could conclude he was treated less favourably because he was a man.

Struck out under rule 37 as having no reasonable prospect of success. Claimant volunteered no details and asserted no facts to support this claim.

Dismissed as out of time (claim relates to matters from August 2022 onwards, well beyond three month limit) and tribunal concluded it was not just and equitable to extend time given lengthy delay without adequate explanation and prejudice to respondent.

Religion harassment claim from February 2023 was out of time before claimant even went to ACAS. Not just and equitable to extend time.

Claim relates to alleged incident in August 2022, well out of time. Not just and equitable to extend time given weak merits and prejudice to respondent from delay.

Age harassment claims from April 2023 onward dismissed as out of time. Tribunal found not just and equitable to extend time. Weak prospects as claimant unlikely to establish discrimination from remarks about being too young for promotion.

Discriminatory dismissal claim had some prospect of success (alleged dismissal connected to family dispute with wife's relatives linked to company principals) but dismissed as out of time and not just and equitable to extend given unexplained delay after 7 September 2023 and prejudice to respondent.

Notice pay claim dismissed as out of time. Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for claimant to present claim in time after being told what to do on 7 September 2023, but he delayed until 20 December without reasonable explanation.

Claims for underpaid variable pay and arrears dismissed as out of time. Not reasonably practicable for delay given claimant's level of other activity between September and December 2023 and failure to act on tribunal's clear instructions.

Holiday pay claim dismissed as out of time under Working Time Regulations. Claimant unable to quantify claim and did not act within reasonable time after being told to re-present claim.