Cases1405705/2023

Claimant v Welsh Ministers

21 June 2024Before Employment Judge N J RoperPlymouthremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(race)struck out

Claim presented approximately 8 months out of time. The tribunal found the claimant had not shown sound reason why proceedings could not have been issued within the limitation period. Despite mental health difficulties, the claimant was well enough to work, prepare detailed grievance correspondence, and ultimately present proceedings. The tribunal concluded it was not just and equitable to extend time and dismissed the claim for being out of time.

Facts

The claimant, an Asian British Bangladeshi civil servant employed by HMRC, was seconded to Welsh Ministers under a loan agreement from March 2021. The loan was intended to last until March 2023 but was terminated on four weeks' notice on 5 September 2022, with the claimant returning to HMRC on 11 November 2022. She raised a grievance on 8 November 2022 complaining about annual leave, ostracism by managers, and that another colleague (Mr Davis) had been given opportunities to remain with the respondent while she had not. Her grievance and appeal were rejected. She commenced ACAS early conciliation on 26 September 2023 and presented a claim for direct race discrimination on 30 October 2023.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim as presented out of time. The alleged discriminatory acts occurred by November 2022 at the latest, making the normal time limit 9 February 2023. The claimant did not commence ACAS EC until September 2023, approximately seven months after the time limit expired. The tribunal found the claimant had not shown good reason for the delay. Despite mental health difficulties, she had been well enough to work continuously, prepare detailed grievance correspondence, and ultimately present proceedings. The tribunal refused to extend time on just and equitable grounds.

Practical note

Mental health difficulties caused by workplace events do not automatically justify extending time limits for discrimination claims if the claimant remained capable of work and other complex administrative tasks during the limitation period.

Legal authorities cited

Keeble v British Coal Corporation [1997] IRLR 336Riley v Tesco Stores [1980] ICR 323Croydon HA v Jaufurally [1986] ICR 4London Borough of Southwark v Afolabi [2003] IRLR 220Department of Constitutional Affairs v Jones [2008] IRLR 128Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police v Caston [2010] IRLR 327Miller v Ministry of Justice [2016] 3 WLUK 394Luton Borough Council v Haque [2018] ICR 1388Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan [2018] EWCA Civ 640Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 23Jones v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2024] EAT 2Robertson v Bexley Community Centre [2003] IRLR 434

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.140BEmployment Tribunals Act 1996 s.18Employment Tribunals Act 1996 s.18ALimitation Act 1980 s.33Equality Act 2010 s.120Equality Act 2010 s.9Equality Act 2010 s.20Equality Act 2010 s.41Equality Act 2010 s.4Equality Act 2010 s.123

Case details

Case number
1405705/2023
Decision date
21 June 2024
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
public sector
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Civil Servant
Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No