Cases107443/2010

Claimant v East Ayrshire Council

22 May 2024Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because the claimant failed to actively pursue it. After being given until 6 May 2024 to provide written reasons or request a hearing, the claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Ms E Alexander filed a claim against East Ayrshire Council in 2010. The claim remained dormant and was not actively pursued. On 15 April 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant a deadline of 6 May 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or request a hearing.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to show cause why the claim should not be struck out but failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal orders, or face strike-out for non-pursuit even after many years.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 rule 37Employment Tribunals Rules rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
107443/2010
Decision date
22 May 2024
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
East Ayrshire Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No