Cases6000499/2023

Claimant v Grovewise Consultants Ltd trading as Forte Reliable Staffing Agency & Best Recruitment

Outcome

Other

Facts

This is a reconsideration application by the first respondent following a judgment dated 20 May 2024 refusing to strike out the claimant's claim. The respondent applied for reconsideration on 18 July 2024, asserting that it had withdrawn its skeleton argument on the judge's advice and was surprised it was referred to in the written reasons. The respondent sought to introduce new arguments to replace the skeleton argument.

Decision

Employment Judge Dawson dismissed the reconsideration application. The judge had no recollection of advising the withdrawal of the skeleton argument, and noted that even if the skeleton argument should have been disregarded, it would not have led to a different outcome. The judge held that it was inappropriate to use reconsideration to advance new arguments that could have been raised at the original hearing, applying the principle of finality.

Practical note

Reconsideration applications cannot be used to advance new arguments that could have been raised at the original hearing, as this would undermine the principle of finality in litigation.

Legal authorities cited

Ministry of Justice v Burton [2016] ICR 1128Lindsay v Ironsides Ray & Vials [1994] ICR 384Newcastle upon Tyne City Council v Marsden [2010] ICR 743Flint v Eastern Electricity Board [1975] ICR 395Outasight VB v Brown [2015] ICR D11

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 70Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 72Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 71

Case details

Case number
6000499/2023
Decision date
20 May 2024
Hearing type
reconsideration
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No