Claimant v Scottish Ministers, acting through their Agency, The Scottish Prison Service
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the respondent had a genuine belief in the claimants' misconduct (disproportionate use of force on a prisoner), based on reasonable grounds (the extent of prisoner injuries shown in photographs compared to the initial Use of Force reports), following a reasonable investigation. The decision to dismiss was within the band of reasonable responses for an employer in the prison service context, where exemplary standards of conduct are required. Both claimants failed to provide adequate explanation for the extent of the prisoner's injuries during internal proceedings.
Facts
Two prison officers with 8 and 11 years' service were dismissed for gross misconduct following an incident on 18 August 2022 in which they restrained a prisoner (Prisoner X) using force. The prisoner sustained significant injuries visible in photographs taken on 22 August. The initial Use of Force reporting forms completed by the officers did not indicate events that would have caused injuries to that extent. An investigation was conducted, disciplinary hearings were held, and both officers were dismissed on 8 March 2023 by the Governor, Scott Watson, who concluded on the balance of probabilities that they had used disproportionate force. Internal appeals were unsuccessful.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed both unfair dismissal claims. Applying the Burchell test, the tribunal found the respondent had a genuine belief in the claimants' misconduct based on reasonable grounds (the discrepancy between the prisoner's visible injuries and the officers' initial reports), following a reasonable investigation. The decision to dismiss fell within the band of reasonable responses for an employer in the prison service, where exemplary standards of conduct are required. The tribunal was careful not to substitute its own view for that of the employer.
Practical note
In public sector employment where exemplary standards apply (such as prison services), an employer may reasonably dismiss for misconduct where there is a significant unexplained discrepancy between reported events and objective evidence of harm, even where direct proof of what occurred is unavailable, provided a reasonable investigation has been conducted and the employee fails to provide adequate explanation during internal proceedings.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 4103912/2023
- Decision date
- 16 May 2024
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 6
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- public sector
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Employment details
- Role
- Prisoner Management Officer
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor